Ugly Truth: Cultural Feminism Today

The Truth About Feminism

Published on Feb 17, 2014

Mainstream feminism is controlled by the elite and its primary motive is to advance cultural marxism, not women’s rights.


Lisa’s point of view on this video.

Excellent summary of what has happened in the American culture today. Women are treated cheaply, our men are being demasculated, neither have any boundaries or rules of standards regarding relationships, and the reasoning behind it is obviously due to the Marxist agenda that was put in place decades and farther still, twisted minds from thousands of years ago.

The Communist Takeover Of America – 45 Declared Goals

Marx, Engels, Lenin?: The Origins of Communism and the Russian Revolution

Karl Marx was the revolutionary thinker whose ideas gave rise to communism. In common with many revolutionaries he saw the destruction of the family as the first step in the achievement of his goals. Why? Because the family is key to passing the social, cultural, and religious ideals of the established order on to the next generation. Families tend to curb antisocial behaviour.
1. denoting behavior that violates the rights of others, societal mores, or the law.

2. denoting the specific personality traits seen in antisocial personality disorder.  behavior and block radical changes. Marx saw the family as the means by which the establishment defended what he called “outmoded out·mod·ed ideology.

Related Post:

Leftwing Corruption of America good, Rightwing Values and Principals bad?

Has America Stopped Trying to Make Good People?

I find this relevant in today’s society based on the HATE-Mongers that I continually encounter on the internet. Granted some of this vitriol is from those that USE the net’s “Incognito” to spew their vileness of who they are inside. Corruption, Greed, Selfishness, Kickbacks, Bribes, Payoffs, Cloture; Lack of Morals, Ethics, Honor, especially in politics,  who rule today under “stealth Id’s” with NO HONOR.

The post below really sums it up and offers some insight into a world that I grew up with in an America that I used to know.



By Dennis Prager · Wednesday, December 16, 2009

The most important question any society must answer is:

How will we make good people?

That is the question Judeo-Christian values have grappled with. There are many and profound theological and practical differences between Judaism and Christianity. But in the American incarnation of Judeo-Christian values — and America is really the one civilization that developed an amalgamation of Jewish and Christian values — the emphasis has been on individual character.

One cannot make a good society if one does not begin with the arduous task of making good individuals. Both Judaism and Christianity begin with the premise that man is not basically good and therefore regard man’s nature as the root cause of evil.

This may sound basic and even obvious, but it is not. In the Western world since the Enlightenment, belief in the inherent goodness of human beings has taken over. This has resulted in an increasing neglect of character development because evil has come to be regarded not as emanating from human nature (which is essentially good) or from morally flawed individuals but from forces outside the individual — especially material ones. Thus, vast numbers of the best educated in the West have come to believe that “poverty causes crime.”

Now, while no one could possibly refute the argument that starving people will steal bread for their families (an act that is morally defensible), the argument that poverty causes crime posits that when poor people in America commit murder and other violent crimes, it is because they are poor.

This is irrational dogma, as much a matter of faith as any theological doctrine.

Two simple facts illustrate this:

  • First, the vast majority of poor people, in America and elsewhere, do not commit violent crimes.
  • Second, a large amount of crime is committed by the middle class and even by the wealthy.

Neither fact prompts the “poverty causes crime” believers to rethink their position.

They need to, not only because the poverty-causes-crime thesis is so demonstrably false, but because it prevents societies from making good people. When society blames evil on forces outside the individual rather than on the individuals who perpetrate evil, society will work to change those forces rather than work to improve the character of individuals. That is a key to understanding why the left constantly attempts to radically change society — how else make a better world?

Conservatives, on the other hand, believe that the way to “repair the world,” in the oft-used Hebrew phrase of those most concerned with “social justice,” is far less dramatic, far less revolutionary and far less macro-oriented. It is the laborious process of raising every generation from scratch with good values and self-discipline. Without both of these, individual goodness and therefore societal goodness is impossible.

That is why the most important question a society can ask is how to raise young people to be good adults.

American society, under the influence of the left, asks other questions: How do we make young people environmentally aware? How do we teach them to fight allegedly rampant racism, sexism, homophobia and xenophobia in society? How do we fight AIDS and breast cancer?

It is, of course, good to be environmentally aware, to fight AIDS and breast cancer, and to oppose bigotry. But before training young people to be social activists, they must first learn character traits — truth telling, financial honesty, humility, honoring parents and, above all, self-control. Before learning to fight society, people need to fight their own nature. The world is filled with activists of all varieties who are loathsome individuals. (I can vouch for that, I see it and fight it daily on the internet!)

In general, we would do well to be far more impressed with a young person who sits next to the less popular fat kid who is eating alone at lunch, who fights the class bully, who doesn’t cheat on tests and who refrains from drug use.

There is no federal budget, no Senate or House bill, no social policy, no health care fix that can do as much good as a society that is filled with decent people.



Related Posts:

Babs Boxer the Ass of Disrespect


Barbara Boxer can stuff her condescending drivel…Here is another example of who needs to be voted the heck OUT of congress!!

Don’t forget!! The elections are just around the corner.

In the mean time, below is one of my favorite versions to her unbelievable interruption to a Brigadier General to demand he address her as ‘senator’ instead of the respectful “Ma’am”.

Boxer is an ass!!!

Jim Hill’s Letter to Barbara Boxer
Many of us witnessed the arrogance of Barbara Boxer as she admonished a brigadier general because he addressed her as “ma’am” and not “Senator” before a Senate hearing.

This letter is from a National Guard aviator and Captain for Alaska Airlines. I wonder what he would have said if he were really angry. Long fly Alaska !!!!!

Dear Senator Boxer:
You were so right on when you scolded the general on TV for using the term, “ma’am,” instead of “Senator”. After all, in the military, “ma’am” is a term of respect when addressing a female of superior rank or position.
The general was totally wrong.

You are not a person of superior rank or position. You are a member of one of the world’s most corrupt organizations, the U.S. Senate, equaled only by the U.S. House of Representatives.
Congress is a cesspool of liars, thieves, inside traders, traitors, drunks (one who killed a staffer, yet is still revered), criminals, and other low level swine who, as individuals (not all, but many), will do anything to enhance their lives, fortunes and power, all at the expense of the People of the United States and its Constitution, in order to be continually re-elected.

Many democrats even want American troops killed by releasing photographs. How many of you could honestly say, “We pledge our lives, our fortunes and our sacred honor”?

None? One? Two?
Your reaction to the general shows several things.

First is your abysmal ignorance of all things military. Your treatment of the general shows you to be an elitist of the worst kind. When the general entered the military (as most of us who served) he wrote the government a blank check, offering his life to protect your derriere, now safely and comfortably ensconced in a 20 thousand dollar leather chair, paid for by the general’s taxes.

You repaid him for this by humiliating him in front of millions.

Second is your puerile character, lack of sophistication, and arrogance which borders on the hubristic. This display of brattish behavior shows you to be a virago, termagant, harridan, nag, scold or shrew, unfit for your position, regardless of the support of the unwashed, uneducated masses who have made California into the laughing stock of the nation.

What I am writing, Senator, are the same thoughts countless millions of Americans have toward Congress, but who lack the energy, ability or time to convey them. Under the democrats, some don’t even have the 44 cents to buy the stamp. Regardless of their thoughts, most realize that politicians are pretty much the same, and will vote for the one who will bring home the most bacon, even if they do consider how corrupt that person is.

Lord Acton (1834 – 1902) so aptly charged, “Power tends to corrupt and absolute power corrupts absolutely.”  Unbeknownst to you and your colleagues, “Mr. Power” has had his way with all of you, and we are all the worse for it.

Finally Senator, I, too, have a title.

It is “Right Wing Extremist Potential Terrorist Threat.”

It is not of my choosing, but was given to me by your Secretary of Homeland Security, Janet Napolitano. And to think, you were offended by “ma’am”?

Have a fine day. Cheers!
Jim Hill

Here she is being a SARCASTIC ASS to Sen. Lindsey Graham as he tries to explain his opinions about the outrageous folly of the Stimulus bill that they voted on and passed, yet did not read!!!

Here she is on the Obamacare protests. Is she now a party to the fashion police?