Home » Dont Tread on Me » Being a Conservative: What does it REALLY mean?

Being a Conservative: What does it REALLY mean?

Media spin and networking blog sites are deceiving Americans!

Being a conservative is not about being a political party.  After listening to the media rhetoric for the past two years, Conservative this, conservative that, Tea party this, Tea party that, Blue dog, yellow dog–all designed to stick a label on individual Americans, so they can be lumped into one big hate feast to be demonized and destroyed by those who oppose what they stand for and represent!

So what exactly IS a Conservative you ask?

Well, It’s very simple really and it’s all about connecting deeds to action, principals to our founding fathers beliefs and God’s Natural law.

A person lives conservatively or they do not.

Let’s do a little analysis on one issue to dissect this elusive creature called conservative.

From a Financial Standpoint

Conservatives learn to make do when they have not.  What does this mean? Well, mostly about going to work bringing home a paycheck  or owning a farm or ranch with animals depending on you caring and feeding them, which produce is marketed to consumers. We have Small Business owners who put sweat and money into a business, not only to make a living, but who go to work every morning knowing that others depend on them to make that business successful in order to provide jobs for others, so they too can provide for their own  families.

Seems our society has become one of no one wants to bother showing up for practice, but ‘everyone wants to be the star quarter-back”, and if that is the case, who is  left on the field to catch the ball? How can a game be won if everyone plays the same position?  I’ll tell you. The game can not be won, nor does the team.

Learning to budget income to debt, are also part of this, and the motto Live within our means is a BIG part of being a conservative. It’s what we do and understand in everyday REAL life, we conserve.

The pundts and political activists have taken the conservative lifestyle based on self-initiative, twisted the meaning in order to demonize those beliefs,  just as the communists did when they infiltrated  the Democratic party.  Being a conservative is a set lifestyle that dates back to our founding fathers and the founding principles that our founding documents were created from. The natural law of God the Creator of us all, can clearly be found in them if a person will only see with his own eyes and hear with his own ears.

Being a conservative is not about forcing one lifestyle onto another, nor about forcing ones belief onto another.

A recent discovery I made, is that there are many out there today who claim to be ‘Conservative” or to represent conservative values and lifestyle, yet in reality, they push ONLY a Neo-Con agenda and use the label term ‘conservative” in order to deceive people. They gather information about individuals who donate money to political causes or those who buy certain books, etc and use that info to generate more sales or donations to whatever agenda THEY are getting paid to promote.

Here is one example:


Some of these same people, mostly people I refer to as two-faced trolls, are using the blogsphere to push a set agenda and get PAID thru networking and pushing the Neo-con agenda.  Proof can be easily found on their blogroll list which shows ad’s or promotes those paying the blog owner for setting their prescribed agenda.

The poser “conservatives” appear as everyday concerned Americans just blogging to voice their opinion, but that is not what they are doing, but instead get paid for their POV,  which invalidates their opinion as I see it, due to conflict of interest and ethical issues.

Word to the wise: Always remember that actions speak louder than words.

If a political person is NOT living or supporting the conservative lifestyle, then they are NOT conservative.  If they advocate for a person who is NOT conservative, QUESTION both of those candidates and the cyber “friend” because something is NOT as it seems to be, truth is being hidden.

If you are within a conservative blog network and find they refuse to address issues about a candidate who they claim is “conservative”, but one you have found to be out of sink in the conservative beliefs or on the issues, and these self-proclaimed conservative bloggers turn it around on you and demonize you for finding it, THERE is your answer! They are NOT true friends, nor or they real conservatives with just an opinion, but instead have a paid agenda to promote.

My advice? Disassociate asap,  because they are also posing as attack trolls from HELL or create multiple ID’s with different persona’s, and as such, play BOTH sides using your convictions and beliefs to make one big nasty wasteland. They feed off your comments, may attempt to “reset” your opinions or beliefs.  LABELING you  this or that, is the most viable weapon they have on hand, but ALWAYS understand the nature of the beast you are dealing with.  The blog “owner” gets paid by your participation and you clicking it’s site and will twist your NORMAL REAL thinking and that of others,  into whatever the agenda is they get paid to do.

Though not fixed or limited to these ten key principals, the link below deals with basic principals of  a Conservative that I happen to agree with.

Ten Conservative Principles

by Russell Kirk

“Being neither a religion nor an ideology, the body of opinion termed conservatism possesses no Holy Writ and no Das Kapital to provide dogmata. So far as it is possible to determine what conservatives believe, the first principles of the conservative persuasion are derived from what leading conservative writers and public men have professed during the past two centuries. After some introductory remarks on this general theme, I will proceed to list ten such conservative principles.

Perhaps it would be well, most of the time, to use this word “conservative” as an adjective chiefly. For there exists no Model Conservative, and conservatism is the negation of ideology: it is a state of mind, a type of character, a way of looking at the civil social order.

The attitude we call conservatism is sustained by a body of sentiments, rather than by a system of ideological dogmata. It is almost true that a conservative may be defined as a person who thinks himself such. The conservative movement or body of opinion can accommodate a considerable diversity of views on a good many subjects, there being no Test Act or Thirty-Nine Articles of the conservative creed.

In essence, the conservative person is simply one who finds the permanent things more pleasing than Chaos and Old Night. (Yet conservatives know, with Burke, that healthy “change is the means of our preservation.”) A people’s historic continuity of experience, says the conservative, offers a guide to policy far better than the abstract designs of coffee-house philosophers. But of course there is more to the conservative persuasion than this general attitude.

It is not possible to draw up a neat catalogue of conservatives’ convictions; nevertheless, I offer you, summarily, ten general principles; it seems safe to say that most conservatives would subscribe to most of these maxims. In various editions of my book The Conservative Mind I have listed certain canons of conservative thought—the list differing somewhat from edition to edition; in my anthology The Portable Conservative Reader I offer variations upon this theme. Now I present to you a summary of conservative assumptions differing somewhat from my canons in those two books of mine. In fine, the diversity of ways in which conservative views may find expression is itself proof that conservatism is no fixed ideology. What particular principles conservatives emphasize during any given time will vary with the circumstances and necessities of that era. The following ten articles of belief reflect the emphases of conservatives in America nowadays.

  • First, the conservative believes that there exists an enduring moral order. That order is made for man, and man is made for it: human nature is a constant, and moral truths are permanent.

This word order signifies harmony. There are two aspects or types of order: the inner order of the soul, and the outer order of the commonwealth. Twenty-five centuries ago, Plato taught this doctrine, but even the educated nowadays find it difficult to understand. The problem of order has been a principal concern of conservatives ever since conservative became a term of politics.

Our twentieth-century world has experienced the hideous consequences of the collapse of belief in a moral order. Like the atrocities and disasters of Greece in the fifth century before Christ, the ruin of great nations in our century shows us the pit into which fall societies that mistake clever self-interest, or ingenious social controls, for pleasing alternatives to an oldfangled moral order.

It has been said by liberal intellectuals that the conservative believes all social questions, at heart, to be questions of private morality. Properly understood, this statement is quite true. A society in which men and women are governed by belief in an enduring moral order, by a strong sense of right and wrong, by personal convictions about justice and honor, will be a good society—whatever political machinery it may utilize; while a society in which men and women are morally adrift, ignorant of norms, and intent chiefly upon gratification of appetites, will be a bad society—no matter how many people vote and no matter how liberal its formal constitution may be.

  • Second, the conservative adheres to custom, convention, and continuity. It is old custom that enables people to live together peaceably; the destroyers of custom demolish more than they know or desire. It is through convention—a word much abused in our time—that we contrive to avoid perpetual disputes about rights and duties: law at base is a body of conventions. Continuity is the means of linking generation to generation; it matters as much for society as it does for the individual; without it, life is meaningless. When successful revolutionaries have effaced old customs, derided old conventions, and broken the continuity of social institutions—why, presently they discover the necessity of establishing fresh customs, conventions, and continuity; but that process is painful and slow; and the new social order that eventually emerges may be much inferior to the old order that radicals overthrew in their zeal for the Earthly Paradise.

Conservatives are champions of custom, convention, and continuity because they prefer the devil they know to the devil they don’t know. Order and justice and freedom, they believe, are the artificial products of a long social experience, the result of centuries of trial and reflection and sacrifice. Thus the body social is a kind of spiritual corporation, comparable to the church; it may even be called a community of souls. Human society is no machine, to be treated mechanically. The continuity, the life-blood, of a society must not be interrupted. Burke’s reminder of the necessity for prudent change is in the mind of the conservative. But necessary change, conservatives argue, ought to he gradual and discriminatory, never unfixing old interests at once.

  • Third, conservatives believe in what may be called the principle of prescription. Conservatives sense that modern people are dwarfs on the shoulders of giants, able to see farther than their ancestors only because of the great stature of those who have preceded us in time. Therefore conservatives very often emphasize the importance of prescription—that is, of things established by immemorial usage, so that the mind of man runneth not to the contrary. There exist rights of which the chief sanction is their antiquity—including rights to property, often. Similarly, our morals are prescriptive in great part. Conservatives argue that we are unlikely, we moderns, to make any brave new discoveries in morals or politics or taste. It is perilous to weigh every passing issue on the basis of private judgment and private rationality. The individual is foolish, but the species is wise, Burke declared. In politics we do well to abide by precedent and precept and even prejudice, for the great mysterious incorporation of the human race has acquired a prescriptive wisdom far greater than any man’s petty private rationality.
  • Fourth, conservatives are guided by their principle of prudence. Burke agrees with Plato that in the statesman, prudence is chief among virtues. Any public measure ought to be judged by its probable long-run consequences, not merely by temporary advantage or popularity. Liberals and radicals, the conservative says, are imprudent: for they dash at their objectives without giving much heed to the risk of new abuses worse than the evils they hope to sweep away. As John Randolph of Roanoke put it, Providence moves slowly, but the devil always hurries. Human society being complex, remedies cannot be simple if they are to be efficacious. The conservative declares that he acts only after sufficient reflection, having weighed the consequences. Sudden and slashing reforms are as perilous as sudden and slashing surgery.
  • Fifth, conservatives pay attention to the principle of variety. They feel affection for the proliferating intricacy of long-established social institutions and modes of life, as distinguished from the narrowing uniformity and deadening egalitarianism of radical systems. For the preservation of a healthy diversity in any civilization, there must survive orders and classes, differences in material condition, and many sorts of inequality. The only true forms of equality are equality at the Last Judgment and equality before a just court of law; all other attempts at levelling must lead, at best, to social stagnation. Society requires honest and able leadership; and if natural and institutional differences are destroyed, presently some tyrant or host of squalid oligarchs will create new forms of inequality.
  • Sixth, conservatives are chastened by their principle of imperfectability. Human nature suffers irremediably from certain grave faults, the conservatives know. Man being imperfect, no perfect social order ever can be created. Because of human restlessness, mankind would grow rebellious under any utopian domination, and would break out once more in violent discontent—or else expire of boredom. To seek for utopia is to end in disaster, the conservative says: we are not made for perfect things. All that we reasonably can expect is a tolerably ordered, just, and free society, in which some evils, maladjustments, and suffering will continue to lurk. By proper attention to prudent reform, we may preserve and improve this tolerable order. But if the old institutional and moral safeguards of a nation are neglected, then the anarchic impulse in humankind breaks loose: “the ceremony of innocence is drowned.” The ideologues who promise the perfection of man and society have converted a great part of the twentieth-century world into a terrestrial hell.
  • Seventh, conservatives are persuaded that freedom and property are closely linked. Separate property from private possession, and Leviathan becomes master of all. Upon the foundation of private property, great civilizations are built. The more widespread is the possession of private property, the more stable and productive is a commonwealth. Economic levelling, conservatives maintain, is not economic progress. Getting and spending are not the chief aims of human existence; but a sound economic basis for the person, the family, and the commonwealth is much to be desired.

Sir Henry Maine, in his Village Communities, puts strongly the case for private property, as distinguished from communal property: “Nobody is at liberty to attack several property and to say at the same time that he values civilization. The history of the two cannot be disentangled.” For the institution of several property—that is, private property—has been a powerful instrument for teaching men and women responsibility, for providing motives to integrity, for supporting general culture, for raising mankind above the level of mere drudgery, for affording leisure to think and freedom to act. To be able to retain the fruits of one’s labor; to be able to see one’s work made permanent; to be able to bequeath one’s property to one’s posterity; to be able to rise from the natural condition of grinding poverty to the security of enduring accomplishment; to have something that is really one’s own—these are advantages difficult to deny. The conservative acknowledges that the possession of property fixes certain duties upon the possessor; he accepts those moral and legal obligations cheerfully.

  • Eighth, conservatives uphold voluntary community, quite as they oppose involuntary collectivism. Although Americans have been attached strongly to privacy and private rights, they also have been a people conspicuous for a successful spirit of community. In a genuine community, the decisions most directly affecting the lives of citizens are made locally and voluntarily. Some of these functions are carried out by local political bodies, others by private associations: so long as they are kept local, and are marked by the general agreement of those affected, they constitute healthy community. But when these functions pass by default or usurpation to centralized authority, then community is in serious danger. Whatever is beneficent and prudent in modern democracy is made possible through cooperative volition. If, then, in the name of an abstract Democracy, the functions of community are transferred to distant political direction—why, real government by the consent of the governed gives way to a standardizing process hostile to freedom and human dignity.

For a nation is no stronger than the numerous little communities of which it is composed. A central administration, or a corps of select managers and civil servants, however well intentioned and well trained, cannot confer justice and prosperity and tranquility upon a mass of men and women deprived of their old responsibilities. That experiment has been made before; and it has been disastrous. It is the performance of our duties in community that teaches us prudence and efficiency and charity.

  • Ninth, the conservative perceives the need for prudent restraints upon power and upon human passions. Politically speaking, power is the ability to do as one likes, regardless of the wills of one’s fellows. A state in which an individual or a small group are able to dominate the wills of their fellows without check is a despotism, whether it is called monarchical or aristocratic or democratic. When every person claims to be a power unto himself, then society falls into anarchy. Anarchy never lasts long, being intolerable for everyone, and contrary to the ineluctable fact that some persons are more strong and more clever than their neighbors. To anarchy there succeeds tyranny or oligarchy, in which power is monopolized by a very few.

The conservative endeavors to so limit and balance political power that anarchy or tyranny may not arise. In every age, nevertheless, men and women are tempted to overthrow the limitations upon power, for the sake of some fancied temporary advantage. It is characteristic of the radical that he thinks of power as a force for good—so long as the power falls into his hands. In the name of liberty, the French and Russian revolutionaries abolished the old restraints upon power; but power cannot be abolished; it always finds its way into someone’s hands. That power which the revolutionaries had thought oppressive in the hands of the old regime became many times as tyrannical in the hands of the radical new masters of the state.

Knowing human nature for a mixture of good and evil, the conservative does not put his trust in mere benevolence. Constitutional restrictions, political checks and balances, adequate enforcement of the laws, the old intricate web of restraints upon will and appetite—these the conservative approves as instruments of freedom and order. A just government maintains a healthy tension between the claims of authority and the claims of liberty.

  • Tenth, the thinking conservative understands that permanence and change must be recognized and reconciled in a vigorous society. The conservative is not opposed to social improvement, although he doubts whether there is any such force as a mystical Progress, with a Roman P, at work in the world. When a society is progressing in some respects, usually it is declining in other respects. The conservative knows that any healthy society is influenced by two forces, which Samuel Taylor Coleridge called its Permanence and its Progression. The Permanence of a society is formed by those enduring interests and convictions that gives us stability and continuity; without that Permanence, the fountains of the great deep are broken up, society slipping into anarchy. The Progression in a society is that spirit and that body of talents which urge us on to prudent reform and improvement; without that Progression, a people stagnate.

Therefore the intelligent conservative endeavors to reconcile the claims of Permanence and the claims of Progression. He thinks that the liberal and the radical, blind to the just claims of Permanence, would endanger the heritage bequeathed to us, in an endeavor to hurry us into some dubious Terrestrial Paradise. The conservative, in short, favors reasoned and temperate progress; he is opposed to the cult of Progress, whose votaries believe that everything new necessarily is superior to everything old.

Change is essential to the body social, the conservative reasons, just as it is essential to the human body. A body that has ceased to renew itself has begun to die. But if that body is to be vigorous, the change must occur in a regular manner, harmonizing with the form and nature of that body; otherwise change produces a monstrous growth, a cancer, which devours its host. The conservative takes care that nothing in a society should ever be wholly old, and that nothing should ever be wholly new. This is the means of the conservation of a nation, quite as it is the means of conservation of a living organism. Just how much change a society requires, and what sort of change, depend upon the circumstances of an age and a nation.

Such, then, are ten principles that have loomed large during the two centuries of modern conservative thought. Other principles of equal importance might have been discussed here: the conservative understanding of justice, for one, or the conservative view of education. But such subjects, time running on, I must leave to your private investigation.

The great line of demarcation in modern politics, Eric Voegelin used to point out, is not a division between liberals on one side and totalitarians on the other. No, on one side of that line are all those men and women who fancy that the temporal order is the only order, and that material needs are their only needs, and that they may do as they like with the human patrimony. On the other side of that line are all those people who recognize an enduring moral order in the universe, a constant human nature, and high duties toward the order spiritual and the order temporal.”
Go here for the list: http://www.kirkcenter.org/kirk/ten-principles.html


Though I do not agree with Fred Thompson 100% of the time, I think he spoke well in this video.



12 thoughts on “Being a Conservative: What does it REALLY mean?

  1. Good afternoon Lisa. On my Lunch Break and wanted to stop by and say hello. This is such a good post and I am wishing you would cross post over for more exposure. People need to define what a true conservative is and you have done that here.

    Lunch break over.

    • Hey Sami
      Thanks and yes, we had a great weekend and some unexpected news. Our son is getting OUT of the Army! YIPEEEEE
      I’m so thrilled I could burst!!! 😉

  2. Lisa, I am back after work now to say how very impressed I am at how you managed to put into a few paragraphs what it truly means to be a Conservative. I must also tell you that while here I am also going to plagiarize your work and steel some of it for my blog post. I love the Yellow Rose of Texas 😉

    • Sami—LOL, the credit really goes to Kirk, he iMO, stated it all so very well.

      Spread the word my friend, the more that can understand what the Neo-Con paid advocates are doing, the more likely we can bring awareness to what they are doing.

  3. Jumped on a forbidden at work and took a chance just to say what an incredible piece of work you have in this Blog Post. Outstanding Lisa, just Outstanding. God Bless you and God Bless these United States of America.

    • Good Morning Sami

      Thank you too my friend. I got so tired of the pundt’s stealing the term “Conservative” and twisting it to push their NEO-CON agenda, just like they did when they overthrew the Dem party. The similarity is exactly the same and as a REAL Conservative, I protest that MOCK UP they are doing.

  4. Lisa – this should be required reading in school government classes. Masterfully done and well thought out. Really, one of your very best posts. I am saving it.

    • Good Morning SH
      Thank you very much for the kind words and much appreciated coming such a well spoken and written Lady as yourself. 🙂

Comments are closed.